Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 2261 - 2280 of 29,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 8:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
No. 2) by the attorneys for JEF for an order pursuant to CPLR §3212 granting Summary Judgment to the Defendant JEF and severing and dismissing the complaint and all cross-claims and counterclaims against said Defendant, on the ground that JEF is not individually liable for the torts or breach of contract, if any, of his co-Defendant F & F, P.C., of which Defendant JEF was at all relevant times president and sole shareholder is granted. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 6:53 am
Co., 2 F.3d 1023 (10th Cir.1993) (affirming certification of a(b)(2) defendant class); Baker v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 7:27 am
Weston, 443 F.3d 661, 667 (8th Cir. 2006) (police did not violate Fourth Amendment when they entered defendant's curtilage for legitimate purpose of seeking voluntary conversation and consent to search). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Nosal, 676 F.3d 854, 863 (9th Cir. 2012), which teaches that an individual does not “exceed authorized access” simply by misusing information that he or she was entitled to view for some other purpose. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 10:06 am by The Docket Navigator
Moreover, the only evidence [defendant] relies upon to factually establish irreparable harm is the declaration [of an employee], in which she states that '[i]f the App is not immediately restored to the iTunes App store, [defendant's] business, which is solely related to selling, upgrading and supporting the App, will be irreparably harmed. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Seay, 620 F.3d 919 (8th Cir.2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) ( see also 620 F.3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v. [read post]