Search for: "Does 1 - 64" Results 2261 - 2280 of 2,813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Readers may note that the statute does not set any limits on the types of reasons that may be found in s.143E notices or s.143F review decisions. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Readers may note that the statute does not set any limits on the types of reasons that may be found in s.143E notices or s.143F review decisions. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:19 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
The only Canadian rule providing for credit for total time in custody is only applicable to life sentences and thus does not apply to Khadr. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 6:07 am
Riccardi, 405 F.3d 852, 863-64 (10th Cir. 2005) (applying the good faith exception to an officer’s search of a seized computer for evidence of child pornography despite the warrant’s lack of particularity). [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 10:00 am by Craig Robins
  This is a minor but nevertheless significant change of $772 per year, or about $64 per month. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
  A typical invalidated claim includes Claim 1 of Patent No. 5,747,282 which reads “1. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:38 am by The Legal Blog
There can be no manner of doubt that the Evidence Act providing in Section 64 thereof of proof of documents by primary evidence only means proof of the original document. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
” So the ECHR provides for the protection of reputation, but does not afford it the status of a Convention right. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 5:41 am by Falk Metzler
§ 64 of the decision):  We further reject calls for categorical exclusions beyond those for fundamental principles already identified by the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:47 am
(We're still using iLife10, our PC struggles to run W7 64 bit, we use the pre-camera iPod Touch, and our phone is definitely not smart.) [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm by Angus McCullough QC
within the meaning of article 1 was essentially territorial but extended in exceptional circumstances requiring special justification to other bases of jurisdiction; but the protection of article 2 does not extend to troop operations abroad [§58]. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am by INFORRM
The Court noted that the domestic courts had classified the relevant statements as value judgments and that the article had been published in good faith (para 64). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 2:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
In August 2007, Genzyme agreed to settle the Biosurgery Division shareholders’ claim for $64 million. [read post]