Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 2261 - 2280 of 4,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2010, 11:03 pm
See '601 patent col.10 l.5-col.11 l.43. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
Criminal Lawyers Association of Ontario, [2013] 3 SCR 3, 2013 SCC 43, the courts cannot and will not interfere with the work of the federal and provincial legislatures. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 12:49 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
However, this may lead to different national interpretations and treatment of EUTM registrations and affect the unitary character of the EU mark, and as we all know, the Court of Justice does not really like that. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 1:57 pm by Debra A. McCurdy
CMS expects that overall OPPS payments under the proposed rule would fall by 0.2%, or $43 million, compared to 2015 levels. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am by John Elwood
§ 1101(a)(43)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act – and therefore constitutes grounds for mandatory removal. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:57 pm by David Frakt
 Of these 28, 12 passed the bar on their first attempt, for a first-time bar passage rate of 43%. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
While not challenged the Court did set aside the tariff on these uses as it was based on the same approach as the fitness tariff, which the Court found breached procedural fairness. ____________________________ [1]< New to Canada, neighbouring rights added to the Copyright Act in 1997 (S.C. 1997, c. 24) to implement obligations assumed by Canada on when Canada acceded to the Rome Convention) March 4, 1998 (the International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:17 am by INFORRM
pp. 199-210(12), Grey, Siobhan Does the Open Justice Principle Require Cameras to be Permitted in the Courtroom and the Broadcasting of Legal Proceedings? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:39 am
The Clark case does have some relevance in that there the same appeals court ruled in 2005 that a pain and suffering verdict for a 43 year old woman who sustained a trimalleolar fracture should be reduced from $1,200,000 ($500,00 past - 2 1/2 years, $700,000 future - 34 years) to $425,000 ($200,000 past, $225,000 future). [read post]