Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 2261 - 2280 of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2017, 4:38 am by RUTH SMITH, MILLS & REEVE
But, in a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has just decided otherwise, stating that damages will only be available if the breach is “sufficiently serious”. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:07 am
Spirits, 563 F.3d at 1353, 90 USPQ2d at 1493; see Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:44 pm
BCCI also states that WSGML never had media rights to sub- license the same in favour of MSM. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am by Daniel P. Hart
  (For our readers in the Garden State, that’s the Crown Dependency in the English Channel, not the home of Bon Jovi and Tony Soprano.) [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am by Daniel P. Hart
  (For our readers in the Garden State, that’s the Crown Dependency in the English Channel, not the home of Bon Jovi and Tony Soprano.) [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am by David Kopel
The Bruen Court cited 45 Supreme Court cases, 22 Circuit cases, 3 federal statutes, 10 other U.S. government documents, 61 state statutes after 1900, 43 state/colonial/territorial statutes before 1900, 10 state cases after 1900, 28 state cases before 1900, 2 local laws, 1 state government document, 10 English statutes, 4 other English government documents, 6 English cases, 5 English treatises, 16 books published after… [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:39 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court notes that, during the sign-up process, an alert states “BY CREATING AN UBER ACCOUNT, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF SERVICE & PRIVACY POLICY. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:22 pm
A more detailed post will follow.* I had previously stated, erroneously, that the arbitration clause between the parties designated English law as the law governing the arbitration. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am by Andrew Smith, Matrix Chambers.
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]