Search for: "English v. English" Results 2261 - 2280 of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
 Because the English Court had jurisdiction over the defendant it has no power to stay proceedings on the grounds of forum non conveniens (see Owusu v Jackson [2005] 1 QB 801, ECJ). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:34 am by JanNovak
Patrick Charles, a Cleveland-Marshall alumnus, published his article “Arms for Their Defence: An Historical, Legal, and Textual Analysis of the English Right to Have Arms and Whether the Second Amendment Should Be Incorporated in McDonald v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
As sentencing isa matter for the judge in English law, giving the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) rather than an Extended Sentence for Public Protection (EPP) was lawful, and did not offend against the principle of ‘lex mitior’ as the maximum sentence for the appellant’s crime was the same under either IPP or EPP. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:36 am by Jackie L. Gross
If you were interested in a story we published last fall about Filarsky v. [read post]
The decision of the SFO not to appeal the decision means that English law will be left with a narrow concept of legal advice privilege for the foreseeable future. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
"The French decision can be found here.The English translation of the decision can be found here. [read post]