Search for: "Fields v State"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 11,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2018, 11:06 am
Facts: This case (Gulf Restoration Network v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
Facts: This case (SiteLock LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 8:18 am
Facts: This case (Obeslo et al v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 1:01 pm
Facts: This case (Sara Hawes v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 8:29 am
Facts: This case (Ramos v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 12:31 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Hoffman v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 12:27 pm
Fields v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:33 pm
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 10:25 am
The Washington Supreme Court recently held that "Hailey's Law" violates the state constitution (State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:09 pm
Georgia joined nine other states in filing an amicus brief in support of the appellants in Rucho v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:02 am
In yesterday’s oral argument in Washington v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:19 am
R v Ahmad & Anor and R v Fields & Ors, heard 10 – 11 February 2014. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:41 am
Suprema v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
The application was for services in Classes 42 (Conducting scientific studies in the field of cardiovascular diseases) and 44 (Medical services in the field of cardiovascular diseases) of the Nice Classification.In November 2016, the EUIPO examiner rejected the application holding that the sign was devoid of any distinctive character under Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR)).The applicant appealed the decision to the First Board of Appeal of… [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
This suggests that long felt need arguments might be more persuasive in patent-active fields, where those in the industry would be aware of competitors’ patents. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:32 pm
In its analysis, the high court said this case is about implied or field preemption, in which federal law is so pervasive that it leaves no room for state laws. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
Sega; and No Doubt v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
In a previous 2000 case, Geier v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
For example, the complaint alleges that “the challenged provisions of SB 94 as applied by the State Bar…” … unconstitutionally infringe upon the rights of Plaintiff, other members of the State Bar and citizens of California seeking legal representation under Article I, Section l0 of the United States Constitution, which states that no State shall pass any law “impairing the Obligation of Contracts. [read post]
