Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 12,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
They could even cite Justice Gorsuch's opinion in the Bostock case. [read post]
18 May 2020, 2:19 pm
It's not justice. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:43 pm
(Hint: If the case comes from the 6th or 9th Circuit, it's almost certainly going to get reversed.)Or you could pick, seemingly at random, a single opinion written by each justice and use it to try and reveal something about the justice and the Court as a whole. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:45 am
And this, despite the conservative 11th Circuit’s 28-page opinion explaining how the state was blatantly trespassing upon the Establishment Clause. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
But as with so many things in life, it’s fine when they do so because they’re right and you’re wrong. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
Unlike previous cases in which the use of such decisive language might have been appropriate (see e.g., the 1971 Namibia advisory opinion which alluded to immediate withdrawal of South African administration and Security Council Res. 660 (1990) demanding that Iraq withdraw from Kuwait immediately and unconditionally), the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict do not easily lend themselves to such a sweeping formulation. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 10:30 am
Here's a link to the opinion. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
But the angriest and most upset I ever heard him was about an old concurring opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia in Herrera v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:02 am
The Army Court of Criminal Appeals issued an unpublished opinion in US v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:39 am
" (Justice Kennedy's opinion for the Court, page 11 of the slip opinion, citations omitted.) [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:54 pm
Where an opinion is premised in part on an incorrect factual understanding, the opinion should be modified accordingly. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:47 am
There is value to a reporter's description of how passionate a justice sounded reading from a dissenting opinion or the dubious expression on a justice's face during oral argument, but there is no reason to elevate this writing over a law professor's analysis that is based on reading opinions and argument transcripts and drawing on a long, scholarly study of the Court's work. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
Justice Benke files a "concurring and dissenting" opinion saying that there was a reasonable basis for the stop given the underlying suspicious circumstances. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 11:22 pm
They're "dangerous. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 1:18 pm
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion, which was authored by Justice David Wecht, draws upon two bodies of law: Implied Consent Statute–Pennsylvania motorists are deemed to have given consent to chemical tests when suspected of DUI. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:03 pm
It's a wonderful, wonderful opinion. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:57 pm
The summary includes those civil cases in which (1) review has been granted (not including grant-and-transfers), (2) review has been denied but one or more justices has voted for review, or (3) the Court has ordered depublished an opinion of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Then there's the other 299,999,998 of us.P.S. - Not Justice Marchiano's fault. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:43 am
We’re down to four pretty big cases for decision. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:07 pm
It is now 10:28 a.m., and the chief justice says, “I have the opinion of the court in No. 23-939, Trump v. [read post]
