Search for: "J Stevens" Results 2261 - 2280 of 4,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2007, 1:40 am
Ramos, J.), entered March 15, 2006, which denied his motion to dismiss the first, fourth, fifth and sixth causes of action. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Wondering what Steven meant when he used the word Orthoganal? [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:11 am by Bill
Convenience has not really improved the experience of recorded music, although you'd have had a hard time persuading me of that back when I was haunting J&R Music World on a regular basis. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 1:15 am by Andrew Trask
Davidoff, Penn Law’s Jill Fisch, and Fordham Law’s Sean J. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Jeff Foust
Steven Palazzo (R-MS), chairman of the space subcommittee of the House Science Committee said he was hopeful that a bipartisan version of the NASA authorization bill—debate about which was unusually partisan last year—could be completed. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:28 pm by Rick Hasen
  Might the CU dissenters (plus Kagan for Stevens) vote to hear the case, so that the hypocrisy of the Supreme Court’s decision could be exposed. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
Of course, the really classy thing would have been to have never asserted the waiver in the first place, and allow the sentence to be corrected through remand from the Ninth . . .Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm by Elizabeth B. Carpenter
(Stevens, J) Justice Stevens asserted that the Equal Protection claim was properly before the Court even though it was not initially presented by the petitioner because the party defending the judgment expressly relied on the issue as a basis for affirming the state court decision. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:40 am by South Florida Lawyers
” The reference is to Susan Chana Lask, a lawyer who had filed a class-action suit against Steven J. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:40 am by Matthew Scarola
Marks reports that Justice Stevens may favor “allowing retired [J]ustices to return to the high court for cases when a sitting [J]ustice has been recused in order to avoid a tie vote. [read post]