Search for: "MATTER OF L R" Results 2261 - 2280 of 7,381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 11:20 am by Ron Coleman
Each of these businesses has either been disqualified by a certifier from getting a certification mark or been manipulated by a certifier into securing a certification mark: a kosher food certification withheld from the restaurant until it changed its name; an R movie rating withheld from the independent movie, whose producer claimed the rating was being given to far gorier—yet non-independent—movies; and a withheld geographical certification of SWISS MADE for the watchmaker… [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
There was a widely publicised Statement in Open Court in a case brought by a North London Mosque against the controversial World-Check due diligence database. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The use of a cold flow improver, wherein the cold flow improver is an oil—soluble polar nitrogen compound carrying two or more substituents of the formula -NR(13)R(14), where R(13) and R(14) each represent a hydrocarbyl group containing 8 to 40 carbon atoms provided that R(13) and R(14) may be the same or different, one or more of which substituents may be in the form of a cation derived therefrom, to enhance the lubricity of a fuel oil composition… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Although criminal convictions occur in open court and may be reported on contemporaneously, as Lord Hope explained in R (L) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3 at [27]: “as [the conviction] recedes into the past, it becomes a part of the person’s private life. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by RJ Marse
”[7] Defendants and several intervening Energy Industry Groups filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber in its subsequent L’Oreal decision suggested that advice in optimising presentation would mean a provider was no longer neutral (para 114). [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:49 am by Joy Waltemath
Capital Int’l Sec., Inc., a 2006 decision, courts first assess whether two entities are joint employers; then they analyze whether the worker in question is an employee or independent contractor of that combined entity (if step one deems them joint employers), or of each entity individually (if it does not). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
The correct approach to that duty is set by the Court of Appeal in decisions such as R v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea ex p. [read post]
There was, to be sure, common law marriage in most states, and this could complicate matters. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]