Search for: "People v David S." Results 2261 - 2280 of 5,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
Buzzfeed adds that former CIA Director David Petraeus is also in the running, as is Kellogg. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A more pointed analysis of TAVIS in the context of s. 24(2) occurred in R. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
Imprisonment preceded national office for leaders ranging from Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah and Cuba’s Fidel Castro in anticolonial struggles to Czechoslovakia’s Václav Havel and South Korea’s Kim Dae Jung in the post-Cold War era [‘Mandela actually saw Algeria’s first president, Ahmed Ben Balla, welcomed back from prison after he was released and before he became independent Algeria’s first… [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Lots of people frame their problems as © problems; Google v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
With many eyes this week on the Ninth Circuit litigation challenging President Trump’s Executive Order regulating entry into the U.S. by nationals of seven Middle Eastern and African countries, less noticed but potentially as important is a separate lawsuit (San Francisco v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:55 am
"The DJ also features CAFA Conundrum: Diversity is What Counts, by Reed Smith appellate specialists Jim Martin and David de Jesus, about the controversy over the scope of CAFA's appellate review provision, and noting that the 9th Circuit recently joined "the 5th, 6th, and 8th Circuits in holding that CAFA's appellate review provision is limited to remand orders where a party claims diversity jurisdiction under CAFA" in Chan Healthcare Group, PS… [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:15 am by Gregg R. Woodnick, PLLC
This is because infants are so young that they do not have the strength or ability to fight back when being smothered.[7] Therefore, when the coroner conducts an autopsy, they find no signs of struggle and are unable to distinguish between an infant’s inability to breathe on their own and an infant being slowly smothered.[8] See also People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:15 am by Gregg R. Woodnick, PLLC
This is because infants are so young that they do not have the strength or ability to fight back when being smothered.[7] Therefore, when the coroner conducts an autopsy, they find no signs of struggle and are unable to distinguish between an infant’s inability to breathe on their own and an infant being slowly smothered.[8] See also People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
I hope the decision-makers at those companies will focus not only on their employees from and customers in certain countries but also appreciate the President's efforts to protect them.Thankfully, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has published several documents relating to State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Greenberger and Nancy Duff Campbell, Co-Presidents of the National Women’s Law Center, echoed Feinstein’s concerns about Roe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
I first met David when he was assistant chief counsel of the Senate Watergate Committee, but in the past 20 years, I’ve had the pleasure of really getting to know this Harvard-trained lawyer.As I was watching President Trump tout Judge Neil Gorsuch’s conservative credentials, when nominating him to take Scalia’s seat on the high Court—just as when I have heard many people tout Justice Scalia’s conservative… [read post]