Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On 13th December, Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down Judgment in Smith v ADVFN plc (No.7) [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB). [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Panopticon Blog has an article on Saini J’s latest ruling on claims arising out of external cyber-attacks in Graeme Smith & others v TalkTalk Telecom Group [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB). [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of  RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade  U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star… [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Norm Emblem, Zev Smith and Josh Shneer have published an article on the International Law Office blog entitled Libel in the age of the Internet: click with caution. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
A research from Ofcom  found that as online news consumption grows people are less likely to check the facts. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Patel indicated she is considering requiring sites like Facebook and Twitter to retain details of the identities of people posting material which could be handed over to police investigating crimes. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 2:54 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 20 January 2025 Saini J handed down judgment in the cases of Smith & Ors v Surridge & Ors [2025] EWHC 74 (KB). [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:05 am
"There are few people who can speak with greater credibility on this case than Stuart. [read post]