Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law)   United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Jon Gelman
 440.34 violate the injured workers' rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:24 am by Beatrice Yahia
State Department spokesperson said. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
It is reminiscent of the UK government’s version of co-regulation: “Government defines the public policy objectives that need to be secured, but tasks industry to design and operate self-regulatory solutions and stands behind industry ready to take statutory action if necessary. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2009) (“Critically, it is the infringing act— making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing—that must be within (or into) the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1334(a) and (b) and the Standing Order of Reference entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 6:11 am by Clara Spera
Security Council at the United States’ urging, the Council deemed the missile launch a “violation of Security Council resolution(s). [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
In many instances, the goods were shipped directly into the United States from suppliers in other countries using international express mail. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:42 am by Anthony Gaughan
As Justice Brennan noted in his concurring opinion in New York Times Co. v. [read post]