Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 2261 - 2280 of 4,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2014, 11:43 am by Rick Garnett
” Second, the Court had ruled more than thirty years ago, in Marsh v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” In contrast, Justice Rivera dissented, stating that “I dissent from the majority's decision because I can find no legal or factual error in the Appellate Division's application of the Pickering balancing test to the facts of these cases. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:40 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court today handed down a 5-4 decision in Town of Greece, New York v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:16 pm by Michael D. Thompson
   The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted summary judgment to Advanced Tech, and the plaintiffs appealed to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
   The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted summary judgment to Advanced Tech, and the plaintiffs appealed to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 2:48 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thereafter, Plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:35 am by Joe Consumer
(Schwab has since removed the clause until the Finra proceeding, or possible court appeals, are completed.) [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:50 pm by Jeremy Saland
  The lower court convicted the defendant of Second Degree Attempted Kidnapping; the defendant appealed. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:08 am by David Lynn
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the appeal of National Association of Manufacturers, et al., v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am by Peter Mahler
The Appellate Court’s Affirmance The defendants appealed Justice Kornreich’s decision to the Appellate Division, First Department, which last month unanimously affirmed the lower court’s ruling. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:33 am by David DePaolo
The thought behind this was that if the parties could not agree which medical professional was going to govern the case then the government would decide, thus cutting down on litigation, ergo costs, and resulting in less dispute.The theory didn't translate into practice and one of the more common complaints I hear as I travel the state is that the QME process a) doesn't work as intended, b) is not timely, c) doesn't have enough physicians who know what… [read post]