Search for: "State v. English"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
A procedural chart has been produced in English (NDFI About Us, Procedures). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:30 am
And in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 8:19 pm
This doctrine has historical roots in American and English common law. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:47 pm
The Court will distance itself from U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 12:42 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 1:24 am
In any event, the Court of Appeal stated that Andrew Smith J's decision was plainly correct and that a single arbitrator should have been appointed.This case highlights the consistent approach of the English courts in seeking to minimise appeals arising from arbitrations under the Act. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:33 pm
V. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 7:25 am
V. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Legal scholarship: First Statute of Westminster [1275] is cited in attorney's briefAmalfitano v Rosenberg, 2009 NY Slip Op 01069, Decided on February 12, 2009, Court of AppealsPrecedents and legislative history are frequently referred to in briefs and court decisions. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 9:51 pm
You can read the entire judgment in the original Dutch here, or lovingly translated into English here. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 5:28 am
This judgment Re Murray (deceased) Crummer v AAI Limited ABN 2020 QSC 155 dealt with the meaning of a householder’s liability policy exclusion for liability for death or injury of anyone who usually lives at the insured address. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:34 am
A recent post at Time.com discussed how the US v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Board overruled Plessy v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:07 pm
In a case that the Supreme Court decided in March 1997 (Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:22 am
One difference between Australian and English defamation law, which might have given a judge pause when applying the approach in Jameel in Australia, is the availability of a defence of triviality under the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 33 and equivalent provisions in the other states and territories. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:14 am
By Eric SegallIn the iconic case Marbury v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:59 am
Interestingly, with regard to this last issue, the Constitutional Court refers to the CJEU decision C-146/13 Spain v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:25 am
Sincerely, Robert V. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
