Search for: "State v. J. L. B."
Results 2261 - 2280
of 2,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
After all, the legal framework of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 11 of the Securities Act is over 90 years old. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
(b) Term- the duration of the relationship between the parties should be worded to reflect the agreement between the parties. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
(b) Term- the duration of the relationship between the parties should be worded to reflect the agreement between the parties. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
The key threshold to meet in asking a court to grant such injunctions is that they can prevent both existing infringement and future infringement provided they are “effective, proportionate and dissuasive” (L’Oreal v eBay (2011 ECJ Case C-324-09). [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2005, 3:40 pm
El tribunal también criticó la terminologÃa eufemÃstica respecto de la encarcelación de los jóvenes tratándola como escuela o casa de recepción, cuando se trata de una institución de confinamiento. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am
Law Enforcement Has Initiated Medicare Audits of Amniotic Liquid / Amniotic Tissue / Skin Substitute / Wound Care Claims: UPIC Audits of Original Medicare Part B Amniotic Tissue / Skin Substitute / Wound Care Claims. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
Judges derive insider trading violations from Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (together known as the “SEC’s antifraud provisions”), and are a “catchall” aimed at fraud, requiring some sort of “device, scheme or artifice to defraud” or some action, which would otherwise “operate as a fraud or deceit upon a person. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
From L.W. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
(j) Optometric corporation. (1) Licensed physicians and surgeons. (2) Licensed doctors of podiatric medicine. (3) Licensed psychologists. (4) Registered nurses. (5) Licensed chiropractors. (6) Licensed acupuncturists. (7) Naturopathic doctors. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
The trial court initially stated that this latter question was outside of its jurisdiction but seems to have reversed course. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Administrative convenience can “never justify the offering of single-sex classes,” the clarification states. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 7:25 am
ZTE and Conversant v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm
Rick’s Cabaret Int’l, Inc., ––– F.Supp.2d ––––, 2013 WL 4822199, at *6 (S.D.N.Y.2013) (club exerted control where it had written behavioral guidelines, imposed fines, and imposed a dress code); Thompson v. [read post]
