Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 3,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2017, 3:12 am
In Taylor & Lieberman v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Indiana, 14-631 and Taylor v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd v Taylor Hampton Ltd continued on 30 and 31 October 2017 before Moulder J. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:44 am
The stories of Alan Gell, Greg Taylor and Darryl Hunt are not hypothetical. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Schwarzenegger, 556 F.3d 950 (9th Cir. 2009) Vinyl Chloride Taylor v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am
Dafoe, Taylor. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
We may have jumped the gun last week when we stated that Davis v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Telford Taylor, the chief NMT prosecutor, came to think of the trial program as a failure. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:12 am
Taylor, 295 F. [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 5:03 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm
See, also, Taylor v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Michael Reed v. [read post]
