Search for: "Strange v. Strange" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,726
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Charles L Zelden
I do Twenty-First century history – and, yes, it does sound strange to my ears to be saying this. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
Cicelski Having just returned from watching oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the highly anticipated case Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm by Leslie Sammis
For the county court judges that hear thousands of misdemeanor cases each year the local customs and procedures vary widely. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:29 am by Glenn Reynolds
Because the Fourth Amendment is widely recognized to have adopted and endorsed those cases, such as Entick v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:01 am by Adam Wagner
The words “that was applicable” were analysed by the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in Regina v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:40 pm by Orin Kerr
But isn’t it a pretty strange argument for an originalist to make? [read post]