Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 51,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 6:31 am
Given the litigation in Virginia and the Stockholders' recent election to Telos’ board of directors, Goodman resigned as Telos’ auditor.Telos retained another auditor, The Reznick Group, P.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 11:25 am
In See’s Candy Shops, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:08 am
The US Supreme Court endeavoured to answer this question once and for all this summer.The case of Joseph Matal v Simon Shiao Tam dealt with a rock band, The Slants, who sought to register their name as a trademark in the US. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Fox v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 5:56 pm
That brings us to State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 6:40 pm
By publishing the book, without getting a patent for the art, the latter is given to the public. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
As a result, the Court granted an injunction against further use of “Herbs R Us” and awarded Toys R Us damages and costs. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
As a result, the Court granted an injunction against further use of “Herbs R Us” and awarded Toys R Us damages and costs. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:04 pm
In Snyder v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:55 pm
Facts: Plaintiff, through use of a purchase order, ordered four airplane wheel assemblies in “overhauled” condition from defendant. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Given the limited prospects of success, therefore, this was not an appropriate case in which s 11(4) and the usual statutory limitation period should be disapplied. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Given the limited prospects of success, therefore, this was not an appropriate case in which s 11(4) and the usual statutory limitation period should be disapplied. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
"Given the vast weight of authority—albeit not formally binding in the First Circuit—permitting warrantless GPS monitoring until Jones was handed down, it is apparent the Baez investigators were acting in good faith when they made use of that technique. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 8:49 am
Further, the case of Sheppard v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 8:49 am
Further, the case of Sheppard v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 7:51 am
This duty extends to any “nonobvious foreseeable danger” arising from the normal use of a given product. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:35 pm
So, put simply, as all participants seek to comply with Jordan and its principles, let us keep R. v. [read post]
