Search for: "Best v. State Bar" Results 2281 - 2300 of 5,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2010, 1:50 pm by Jim Gerl
Do you think that something - - in fact, there was a Washington State federal trial court decision in Mercer Island that said that the Raleigh standard sets the bar too low and they were using the 1997 amendments to based that, not even the no child left behind stuff. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:32 am by lawmrh
The study also revealed that judges often failed to report misconduct to the State Bar despite having a legal obligation to do so. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in California v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:40 pm by Mark Herrmann
During discovery, it turned out that an in-house lawyer monitoring a trademark case was only an “inactive” member of a state bar. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Such claims are barred under general preclusionprinciples only to the extent they can bebarred by issue preclusion, with its attendant limitations.Brain Life, LLC v Elekta Inc., 746 F.3d 1045, 1056 (Fed.Cir. 2014); see Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
  Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't  absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of  Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
On May 1, 2, and 3, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): United Teachers of Los Angeles v. [read post]