Search for: "Does 1 - 64" Results 2281 - 2300 of 2,813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The idea that shareholders have the right to make the final decision about an unsolicited tender offer does not necessarily follow, for example, from the mere fact that shareholders have voting rights. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
G 5/83 [2-5]; G 1/07 [3.1]; G 2/08 [4]). [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 6:16 pm
Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1563-64 (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Unlike Michigan's statute, the New York statute authorizing judicial dissolution at the behest of an oppressed minority shareholder, Section 1104-a(a)(1) of the Business Corporation Law, does not define "oppressive" conduct. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), it’s not supposed to make adventurous predictions  Federal courts are “not free to engraft onto those state rules exceptions or modifications which may commend themselves to the federal court, but which have not commended themselves to the State in which the federal court sits. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:45 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The Court starts by noting that it does not intend to use a standard “quick look” analysis. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Think about that - the work of 200 dedicated people affected the lives of 1 million. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 11:17 pm by Marta Requejo
In paragraph 64 the ECJ establishes which decisions fall within the  scope of article 20. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:01 am
That does not make entire generations selfish [read post]