Search for: "General Products Corp" Results 2281 - 2300 of 6,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 6:57 am by Brian A. Comer
Nissan Motor Corp., 77 F.3d 736, 738 (4th Cir. 1996), the court stated in dicta that the “ordinary consumer” standard for determining if a product is unreasonably dangerous does not necessarily apply in the case of products associated with allergic reactions in an appreciable number of consumers. (2) Products Consumed Over a Long Period of Time Comment j. also carves out an exception to the duty to warn if the potential danger of a product… [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Lutheran General Hospital, 759 N.E.2d 533, 554-55 (Ill. 2001). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:49 am
General Motors Corp., 190 F.3d 244, 251-52 (4th Cir. 1999); Fernandez v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 12:57 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Last month in Nairobi United Nations Undersecretary General Amina Mohammed called nurdles “an ocean Armageddon. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Imation Corp. that when an alleged infringer instructs users to use a product in an infringing way, there is sufficient evidence for a jury to find direct infringement. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 General Motors Corp., 624 F.2d 1373 (5th Cir. 1980) Alexander v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP)   Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46)   Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46)   United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office)   United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 5:00 am by Joy Waltemath
The majority found “inapposite” the 1986 ALJ decision in Pelron Corp., which involved the manufacture of products by mixing ethylene oxide. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
– ASA rules competition promoters can offer third party products as prizes without consent (IPKat) The UK is still in the IP thought leadership game (IAM) United States US General US/UK Intellectual Property Office statement on cooperation (Patent Baristas) USPTO year in review – and a look forward (Director’s Forum) NASA needs you! [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm by Gene Killian
  Charon then contacts Mayfair’s clients to sell them insurance products. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dynascan Corp., 38 F.3d 1161 (11th Cir.1994) (per curiam) (affirming extraterritorial application of the Lanham Act where a U.S. corporation purchased infringing products to sell exclusively to consumers in South America). [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:50 am by Brian A. Comer
  A seller is also not required to warn of dangers that are generally known and recognized, and therefore a product is not defective or unreasonably dangerous if the danger associated with the product is one the product's users generally recognize. [read post]