Search for: "Harris v. Harris"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 7,655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
Ct. 1744, 1748 n.2 (2014) (decision based on legal erroris abuse of discretion); Harris v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:50 am
So it was fun to see the oral argument before the Court in Gabelli v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:44 am
Harris, where Harris argues his rape conviction should be reversed because the sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) was allowed to read to the jury the history the victim gave her. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 7:53 am
A second pro se plaintiff who had filed jointly was dismissed without prejudice, allowing him if he wishes to file a separate action.In Harris v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d at… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d at… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d at… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d at… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d at… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d at… [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:00 pm
Reading the facts of Gabelli v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:54 am
Harris (preview here). [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 1:58 pm
Justice Thomas asked counsel for the plaintiff about the Appellate Court’s heavy reliance on Harris v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 7:09 am
Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 383, 127 S. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:38 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 8:38 am
Harris, Jr., M.D., Defendant, NC App No. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:28 am
By Eric Goldman Evans v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
