Search for: "In Re: CONTEMPT"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 3,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 2:59 pm
., was every British Twitter user who “re-tweeted” the offending accusations technically in contempt of court?). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
Rather than reduce numbers of federal inmates, the Sheriff may decide to "refuse to accept any person arrested for nonviolent misdemeanors or felonies; arrange for scheduled reporting for people jailed for civil or criminal contempt; find alternative facilities to house inmates [or] move inmates in protective custody to other facilities. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
I ask simply this: when did the legal system become a sociological experiment in “re-tuning” people, simply because they had a singular incident with a policeman, an agent of the State? [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:18 am
Everyone knows that in the United States if you’re a robber caught breaking into someone’s house, you’ll be brought to trial, but if you’re caught breaking into someone else’s country, you’ll be free to take to the lecture circuit, write your memoirs, or become a university professor. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:26 am
You’re useless. [read post]
28 May 2011, 11:20 am
If you are the party to such an agreement and have any questions as to what you’re supposed to do or what the other party is supposed to do under the agreement, consult with an attorney immediately. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
The Bench as well as the Bar has to avoid unwarranted situations or trivial issues that hamper the cause of justice and are in the interest of none.17) In the case of Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate, In Re: , (1998) 7 SCC 248, the advocate was charged of criminal contempt of Court for the use of intemperate language and casting unwarranted aspersions on various judicial officers and attributing motives to them while discharging their judicial functions. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:04 pm
In re Coy Reece, No. 09-0520 (DB). [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:00 am
See In re Magallon, 09-07-438CV, 2007 WL 2962934 (Tex. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:18 am
Lawprofs tend to think they’re hugely important. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:49 pm
If you’re suing people for saying that you’re an unqualified idiot, you might not want to emphasize that the judge reacted to your opening statement by asking your client if he wanted a new lawyer. 3. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:26 am
Omitting known future income: Whether you’re expecting a tax refund or a hefty inheritance, it’s important to include it in bankruptcy petitions. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:45 am
They're clearly making a judgement that although the law is unclear on whether it's legally safe to report what's said in Parliament that flouts a court order, the risk of any successful legal action against them for contempt of court is so low that it's well worth taking the residual legal risk. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:33 am
” Mr Justice Eady Well…..after 75,000 unpaid ‘reportertweeters’ for The Sun et al.. managed to effectively break an injunction on Twitter and, thereby, commit technical contempts of court, John Hemming MP took what he clearly believes to be a principled stand, by naming the footballer. [read post]
21 May 2011, 5:53 am
It is a problem and one we’re going to have to face and deal with. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:17 am
"We’re pleased that the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment, and we’re pleased by the basic position that the beneficiary of a civil protective order should be permitted to enforce that order through an intrafamily contempt proceeding," he said. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:58 am
“I’m telling you right now, you make a move, and you’re going down! [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:12 pm
From the Albuquerque Journal: Former state District Judge Sam Sanchez of Taos so abused his judicial powers that he can never hold judicial office again, the New Mexico Supreme Court said in its final order in a disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:58 pm
” Governor Perry even flirted with secessionist arguments during his campaign for re-election and otherwise has expressed only contempt for the national government.However, guess what. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:51 am
Sure, because censorship (rationally defined) is offensive and contemptible. [read post]
