Search for: "JOHN DOE #2"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 13,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
" John Kennedy's thesis DID DEFEND the appeasement policies of Chamberlain. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
On Oct. 5, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a habeas petition on behalf of John Doe, the detained combatant, alleging that the detention was in violation of the Non-Detention Act (NDA). [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 2:47 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:38 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:29 am
§271(b) requires knowledge that the induced acts constitute patent infringement; and (2) that deliberate indifference to a known risk that a patent exists does not satisfy the knowledge required by Section 271(b). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
See: Sopinka, John, et al, The Law of Evidence in Canada, 2nd Edition, Buttersworth, 1999, “The Opinion of Experts”. 2. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 6:42 pm
Justice Myers noted that civil proceedings are assumed to involve claims and judgments in personam (against a person), which is why “John Doe” placeholders are used until a defendant is identified. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:32 am
In my previous post, I set at 80 percent the probability that, at yesterday's NYU Tax Policy Colloquium discussion of John Roemer's A Theory of Cooperation in Games With an Application to Market Socialism, I would "end up recounting the tale of the unfair bad grade (worst of my career) that I got as a freshman on a Kant paper. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:07 pm
John Does 1-54, Case No. 07-2-08568-8 SEA (King County Sup. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:13 am
")Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: I think the mark suggests that the pet food contains some caviar, not that it is totally caviar.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:27 am
Balancing the relevant duPont factors, the Board found confusion unlikely, and it dismissed Opposer's Section 2(d) claim.Dilution: Because Opposer failed to prove fame for purposes of Section 2(d), it perforce did not meet the higher standard for fame under Section 43(c), and so the Board dismissed opposer's dilution claim as well.Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:08 am
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Precedential No. 34: TTAB Dismisses Monster Energy's Section 2(d) Claim On Summary Judgment Due to DIssimilarity of Design Marks Precedential No. 29: After an Exhausting 2(d) Analysis, TTAB Finds HME (Stylized) Confusable with KME for Building Products Precedential No. 27: TTAB Renders Split Decision in Appeal From Section 2(d) Refusal of IMPACT for Various Healthcare Services Precedential No. 12: TTAB Hands… [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:06 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
Thanks.This post includes a draft of Chapter 2. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 4:44 am
(TTABlogged here).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:36 pm
High Court Hears Arguments on Class Arbitration in Price Fixing Case This posting was written by John W. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:46 am
On June 13, 2012, Senator John D. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:27 pm
But the book does much more than that. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
You can reach John at John@slgattorneys.com Follow John on Twitter: https://twitter.com/JohnGihon Follow my blog: http://www.floridaimmigrationlawyerblog.com [read post]
