Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 9,188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2021, 6:33 am
The parties agreed that Aronson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 10:37 pm
The Yankees got off to a rocky start by alleging that "Applicant did not use the BASEBALLS EVIL EMPIRE mark for the goods covered in the Application in United States commerce prior to its constructive first use date of July 7, 2008. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:28 pm
I’m not convinced Daubert (read United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:55 am
It also provides representative examples of the mark as displayed on products in stores in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am
Today,as we mark the 57th anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 10:04 am
Facts: This case (Below, Joshua et al v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:51 am
Facts: This case (McKeon v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
To construe “these four puzzling opinions that have few common aspects,” Tyree employed the analysis for such situations adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Marks v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:06 am
" There was no evidence that Michoacana has any meaning in the United States vis-a-vis ice cream. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
After an investigation, the USCP’s [USCP=United States Capitol Police]Disciplinary Review Officer proposed that Officer Morris be terminated. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 9:30 pm
NLRB, 26 F.3d 168, 171 (D.C.Cir.1994); see United States Dep't of Justice v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 12:24 pm
Firebird Restaurant Group, LLC et al – United States District Court – Northern District of Texas – August 21st, 2019) involves of a claim of trademark infringement. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am
True, an objectively reasonable traffic stop is not invalidated because the primary motivation of the police was to investigate some other matter (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]; People v. [read post]
