Search for: "Reiter v Reiter"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 6,282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
Critics of the bill may find some solace in a recent ruling in Crossen v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 2:16 pm
The reasoning of the court is a verbatim reiteration of an Athens Court of Appeal judgement from the ‘90s. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:22 am
Just over three weeks after vacating a regulation barring third party employers from claiming the companionship exemption for minimum wage and overtime, in a January 14, 2015 decision in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
District Court Judge Vacates DOL’s Modified Definition of “Companionship Services” Continue Reading…
16 Jan 2015, 9:22 am
Just over three weeks after vacating a regulation barring third party employers from claiming the companionship exemption for minimum wage and overtime, in a January 14, 2015 decision in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am
The Court reiterated the rule that judicial review of SEQRA determinations does not include determining the desirability of a proposed action. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:04 am
” The following case, citing Walter and reiterating the Rhino factors cited in Gen. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am
The Court reiterated the rule that judicial review of SEQRA determinations does not include determining the desirability of a proposed action. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:00 am
(Patent Docs) Roundup Ready Soybean: Infringement of US patent: Monsanto Co. et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:27 am
In State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
Bard v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:35 am
We reiterate that where the parties had agreed that no interest shall be payable, the arbitrator cannot award interest for the amounts payable to the contractor under the contract. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
Substantial evidence:The Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence; the majority does not show otherwise.2 As reiterated in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:54 am
CRUMPTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:39 pm
To the v [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 7:36 am
It cites the Tenth Circuit ruling in Grossman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
In this regard, Hadley v Kemp is not an isolated instance (see Rockford Map Publishers at 148-9; Miller v Civil City of South Bend at 1093-5; Garcia v Google at 742-3). [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 8:48 am
The court in Cincinnati v. [read post]
