Search for: "SAID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 2,881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:46 am
One finds at "the lookout" at news.yahoo:In January [2011], [Amy] Myers [of Cherry Hill, NJ] watched agasp as [Michele] Bachmann said America's founding fathers "worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:18 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.MITCHEL A. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on October 29, 1963. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
District Judge Susan Webber Wright of the Eastern District of Arkansas said. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 25, 1935. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The United States of America and his Majesty the King of Denmark, being desirous to confirm their friendly relations and to promote the cause of justice, have resolved to conclude a treaty for the extradition of fugitives from justice, and have appointed for that purpose the following plenipotentiaries: The President of the United States of America, John Hay, Secretary of State of the United States; and His Majesty the… [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:17 am
United States. [read post]
5 May 2011, 7:26 am
Likewise, in Montana v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on March 1, 1909. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:30 pm
" Citing: United Transp. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm
On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:36 am
Another is U.S. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am
Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:18 am
Brief for the United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:02 pm
It said: The Parties agree that this Agreement is to be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Tennessee in the United States of America and Disclosing Party [the inventor guy] consents to the personal jurisdiction of, and agrees that exclusive jurisdiction shall reside in, all courts of the State of Tennessee and the U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:31 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
However, before State Street Bank v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 am
The United States Department of Agriculture helped research the identification of a bank. [read post]
