Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
(Michigan v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
http://katzjustice.com Today, the United States Supreme Court substantially retreated from Crawford v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:58 am
United States, which challenged whether an individual under surveillance has the right to sue when the government has kept documentation of this surveillance. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia explained in Lehnert v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:41 am
Conroy v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest." [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
As the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia explained in Printz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am
Privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States are not the same thing as privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:15 am
United States). [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:06 am
The widely splintered ruling, announced by the Chief Justice, came in United Haulers Association v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:35 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, argued next on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of petitioner. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
United States and Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
United States ex rel., Karen T. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
(May 4, 2009) (Scalia, J.), the United States Supreme Court reiterated in no uncertain terms that the "savings clause" of Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act says that state contract law provides the rule of decision for determining the scope of an arbitration agreement: Neither [Section 2 nor 3 of the FAA]. . . [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:08 am
Like the legal profession generally, the United States Supreme Court has a reputation as slow to embrace new technologies. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
The United States was founded on a contradiction: all men are created equal; our Constitution enshrines slavery. [read post]
13 Oct 2005, 7:06 pm
State, 47 Md. 485; Plumbly v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:46 am
” In Sykes v. [read post]