Search for: "State v. David" Results 2281 - 2300 of 12,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2007, 7:20 pm
 July 20, 2007.Here is a link to the decision.This case was originally edited by David Pilley.On July 10, 2006, Ms. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:33 am by Meg Martin
If you need assistance using the Universal Citation format, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.] [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:19 pm by Darren Rosenblum
And also this week, David Boies and Ted Olson did a phenomenal job of in the Ninth Circuit panel’s hearing on the appeal of Perry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:37 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Judge David Hamilton's concurring opinion in that case illustrates the importance of choice-of-law clauses and how predictability over which state's law applies is essential to litigation strategy. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Anonymous v Anonymous 2024 NY Slip Op 05303 Decided on October 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Anonymous v Anonymous 2024 NY Slip Op 05303 Decided on October 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:00 am by Lubiner & Schmidt, LLC
In this particular case, the defendant, David Laurick, was convicted by a municipal court in the state of New Jersey of driving while intoxicated. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:05 am by Kim Krawiec
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (by Donna Nagy and David Zaring), Morrison v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am by Sam Barr
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any vagueness problems in the terms of… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 3:08 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By David Kadue On Tuesday, January 20, 2015, the Court declined to take the case of CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC v. [read post]