Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm
On Thursday, the Court issued an order in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
On June 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Sixth Judicial District Court, which involved a Fourth and Fifth Amendment challenge to a state law requiring persons to identify themselves when stopped by the police. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:21 am
The Court focused on three areas of analysis: First, a decision letter does not constitute a judicial determination which may be considered a final order. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
The first one was Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 5:04 am
Abbott v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:07 am
Lamone, the Court considered two questions about the process of gerrymandering, or drawing political districts to benefit candidates from a political party. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:02 am
Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 12:00 am
On August 24, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal issued an opinion in Ober v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:50 pm
United States—the first "kids climate case"—the U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
[i] A few years later, another case in the same judicial district against the same defendant for the same product resulted in the grant of summary judgment. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
The Court here distinguished Nikula v Finland on these grounds. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:30 am
"* An individual acts "pro se" by serving as his or her own attorney in a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding.** Razzano v Remsenburg-Speonk UFSD, 41 N.Y.S.3d 72The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/19590bd6-7c4a-43be-82e8-0d96d8dd64f5/1/doc/17-775_so.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/19590bd6-7c4a-43be-82e8-0d96d8dd64f5/1/hilite/ [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 5:34 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
Baseline Issue The Court first rejected the argument that the EIR improperly used a baseline that did not exclude the SWP’s continuing diversions of water from the Delta. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 1:39 am
The plaintiffs’ lawyers first tried to avoid the PSLRA by pursuing their claims in state law suits to which the PSLRA. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:05 am
Rev. 21.Caffrey, Denise, United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
(Poet, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 11:30 am
U.S., Supreme Court docket 01-8780) and a Tenth Circuit decision finding only a collective right for members of a state militia (Haney v. [read post]
