Search for: "State v. South"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 11,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
Significantly, the footage has not been relied upon by the state or the defence and thus it has no bearing on Pistorius’s murder trial whatsoever. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:44 pm
The paper was given at the NSW State Legal Conference on Thursday 28 August 2014. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
Bank v.Atlantic States v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am
South Carolina State Conf. of the NAACP (reversing a lower court judgment that had invalidated South Carolina's electoral map on the ground that it was racially gerrymandered to undercut Black voting strength). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
" Skidmore v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am
Goliath v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:13 pm
Christus Health Gulf Coast v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 5:09 pm
A New South Wales Supreme Court jury handed down its verdict on Monday in the Chris Gayle defamation action against Fairfax. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:31 am
Circuit Court of Appeals gave a pro se (acting as his own attorney) defendant a break in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
It had never been applied to 14th Amendment section 5 or 15th Amendment section 2 legislation in the past; and South Carolina v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina has reached the same conclusion. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
Instead, it held that the district court did not err by applying the pre-Cel-Tech formulation set forth in South Bay Chevrolet v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 11:18 am
See Perez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:31 pm
Kerlin v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 pm
Baby Girl before both the United States Supreme Court and the South Carolina Supreme Court and in Nielson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
(citations omitted) The problem was not unique to the South. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 7:41 am
District Court Chief Judge Robert Miller Jr. decision Dec. 18, 2007 in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
In Reklos v Greece ([2009] ECHR 200). the Court stated that while the right to control the use of one’s image generally involves the possibility of refusing publication, “it also covers the individual’s right to object to the recording, conservation and reproduction” of that image. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:47 pm
Alabama, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Tennessee … joined the litigation as intervenor-defendants. [read post]
