Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 5,890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
As we have seen here, an alleged violation of this law, if true, could result in serious local, state, and federal fines. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
As we have seen here, an alleged violation of this law, if true, could result in serious local, state, and federal fines. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 5:39 am
In a 6-0 ruling, the state’s highest court said a local school board, which was hit with a drastic loss in state and local funding in 2010, violated the law when it decided to impose involuntary furloughs to save money after three failed attempts to open negotiations with the town’s teachers’ union.. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:09 am
An opinion was issued stating that the use is not permitted. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am
See Town of Babylon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 12:02 pm
The Plaintiff Is Struck by a Car as He Crossed the Street In September 2007, the plaintiff in the case of Strycharz v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:51 am
Example: Jill passes the CPA exam and goes to work for an accounting firm in a small town. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:51 am
Example: Jill passes the CPA exam and goes to work for an accounting firm in a small town. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:00 am
A police officer eligible to receive General Municipal Law §207-c benefits may file a claim against his or her employer pursuant to General Municipal Law §205-eDiegelman v City of Buffalo, 2016 NY Slip Op 07817, Court of AppealsGeneral Municipal Law §205-e gives a “Right of action to certain injured or representatives of certain deceased police officers. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 9:40 pm
Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc v Town Board of the Town of Coeymans, 2016 WL 6636927 (NYAD 3 Dept. 11/10/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Necessary Parties [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Footnote 2 in Stewart states: Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably 'to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force' (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
Or consider the somewhat obscure but incredibly important United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:39 pm
ISIS fighters captured the town two years ago and destroyed many of the historic ruins, releasing video of the devastation. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
That is a significant change in the law because the Supreme Judicial Court held in the 2012 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
That is a significant change in the law because the Supreme Judicial Court held in the 2012 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:13 am
(Tom Hood/Associated Press) Last week, the New Jersey attorney general conceded that the New Jersey stun gun ban violates the Second Amendment (see the filing in State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:46 am
Additional Resources: Anderson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:46 am
Additional Resources: Anderson v. [read post]
