Search for: "United States Liability Insurance Company" Results 2281 - 2300 of 3,789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2014, 5:14 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
 Because insurance companies would like to minimize payments of claims, they are willing to pay for the cost of arguing issues of liability and damages to minimize their insured’s exposure including paying attorney’s fees to go to court, if necessary. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  It’s not clear that the individual plaintiffs as shareholders can sue for injuries based on the way in which their financial contributions would be used by the companies or by the insurance plans (e.g., to pay insurance premiums, or to provide reimbursements for contraceptive purchases). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
In general, and at least in the United States, executives at public companies don’t need to be convinced that their companies need to have D&O insurance. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
In general, and at least in the United States, executives at public companies don’t need to be convinced that their companies need to have D&O insurance. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Executives should be encouraged to take prudent risks for the benefit of the company and its constituents, and should not be stymied by the fear of personal liability if a decision ultimately harms the company. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Executives should be encouraged to take prudent risks for the benefit of the company and its constituents, and should not be stymied by the fear of personal liability if a decision ultimately harms the company. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
    By way of background, Side A D&O insurance (also referred to as “Coverage Part A”) covers non-indemnifiable (or “not indemnified,” depending on the wording) Loss[i], meaning that a Company (1) cannot advance or indemnify its directors and officers under its bylaws, or (2) is financially unable to do so (such as when a company files a proceeding under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
    By way of background, Side A D&O insurance (also referred to as “Coverage Part A”) covers non-indemnifiable (or “not indemnified,” depending on the wording) Loss[i], meaning that a Company (1) cannot advance or indemnify its directors and officers under its bylaws, or (2) is financially unable to do so (such as when a company files a proceeding under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code). [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:21 am by David DePaolo
Porteadores argued that the ICA did not have jurisdiction over the dispute because it was a foreign company and because its corporate activities in the United States were governed by the North American Free Trade Agreement, not Arizona comp law. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
., the precious metals market, including gold) and the potential coverage implications these investigations and civil suits may have on insurers. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 7:12 am by Mark S. Humphreys
It is a 2013, United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals case styled, The City of College Station, Texas v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The world of directors and officers liability has long been characterized by rapid change. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:04 am by Ravi S. Nagi
  BoltNagi PC is one of the largest firms in the United States Virgin Islands and has experienced legal professionals to assist companies based in or seeking to relocate in the U.S. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm by Betsy McKenzie
It appears that TAFTA would require the United States, not just federal but also state and local laws to do something very like the E.U. harmonization principle, where the member states must bring their local laws into agreement with the European Union agreed law. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
[i] The Court re-affirmed these principles stating the following: The Copyright Act strikes “a balance between promoting the public interest in the encouragement and dissemination of works of the arts and intellect and obtaining a just reward for the creator… It seeks to ensure that an author will reap the benefits of his efforts, in order to incentivize the creation of new works. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 6:29 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Court granted summary judgment to the insurance company because the policy only covered accidents occurring in the United States and its territories and possessions, Puerto Rico and Canada. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States applies on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]