Search for: "APPLICATION OF SHARP" Results 2301 - 2320 of 2,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2009, 6:10 am
Those applicable to this case are found in that clause of the original Constitution which says "That the trial of all crimes, except in case of impeachment, shall be by jury," and in the fourth, fifth, and sixth articles of the amendments. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/ML5viY (Linda Sharp) Shrink it Down: Technology Assisted Review in Audio Discovery - http://bit.ly/P81RMd (Jeff Schlueter) Speed vs. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The irrefutable evidence that IPSO is and was always intended to be the same kind of sham regulators as its three un-illustrious predecessors emerges clearly from how it administers its primary remedy. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
This discrimination between local (that is, in-state) schools and non-local schools is facially overt and sharp, and raises precisely the kinds of unfair competitive advantages that dormant Commerce Clause doctrine exists to prevent. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Non-bank financial intermediation (NFBI) – encompassing a broad range of capital sources, including broker-dealers, private funds, and open-end funds (OEFs) – is vital for the financing of the real economy, serving as a critical complement to the traditional banking sector. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/ML5viY (Linda Sharp) Shrink it Down: Technology Assisted Review in Audio Discovery - http://bit.ly/P81RMd (Jeff Schlueter) Speed vs. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 6:04 am
In describing this new resolution mechanism, I would like to focus on five elements: applicability, resolution powers, funding, international cooperation, and a requirement for "living wills. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
The history of how this came to be is vexed, and we need not review the involved story of the roles variously played by Professor Glueck, Colonel Chanler, Colonel Bernays, President Roosevelt, Secretary Stimson, Justice Jackson, and Baron Shawcross that led to framing the trial around the crime of aggressive war.[11] As Jonathan Bush has demonstrated, the decision made for sharp disagreements not only among the Allied powers – the French in particular never accepted this stratagem… [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2016, Sharp and Hamblen LJJ heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm by Chris Castle
  While this may have seemed like paranoid rambling before the last year or two, Google’s actions starting at least with the Google Books case should bring its ultimate goals into sharp focus. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
As many Verdict readers know, the Supreme Court this term will hear arguments in Moore v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:03 am by Minick Law
The written plan of SHP changed the location of the checkpoint location every thirty minutes to avoid identification of the checkpoint on a mobile direction application. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Frances Z. Brown
For example, the State Department in September 2021  criticized the “military seizure of power” in Guinea, and in January 2022 said the military in Burkina Faso had “dissolved the government and the national assembly and suspended the constitution,” but in both cases refrained from using the word “coup” until weeks or months Yet as former U.S. government legal counsel Sarah Harrison points out, “simply calling an event a coup does not legally trigger… [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Indeed, not only is there no sharp division of lower court rulings on the merits of this question, but both of the decisions mentioned—by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the Eighth Circuit—were rendered under very time-constrained conditions that the Degraffenreid dissenters themselves argue is sub-optimal for a court to decide such important and complicated issues.Second, the political backdrop under which review by the Court of these issues today would occur is very… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/ML5viY (Linda Sharp) Shrink it Down: Technology Assisted Review in Audio Discovery - http://bit.ly/P81RMd (Jeff Schlueter) Speed vs. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
They marshal facts, research governing law, navigate tricky evidentiary issues, and use sharp questioning techniques to bring out critical facts in the courtroom. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed October 21, 2021, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s order finding the real party developers of a UC Berkeley campus development project – undertaken for the University’s benefit, and in which it had a strong vested interest – were necessary parties, but were not indispensable parties to a CEQA action challenging the project EIR under the factors of the Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) § 389(b). [read post]