Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C" Results 2301 - 2320 of 4,785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 6:19 am by Robert A. Epstein
”  In its decision, the judge granted Wife sole legal and physical custody of the child and, among other forms of relief, $2,000 per week in permanent alimony through a wage garnishment. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
After all, if the jury had acquitted on both counts, the defendant would not be subject to article 6-C at all, despite the sworn statements by the victim concerning multiple incidents of sexual intercourse. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 3:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
No parole jail time credit (Penal Law §70.40(3)(c)) was certified by the New York State Board of Parole pursuant to Executive Law §259-c(12). [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:13 am by Robert Brammer
Please note that the topics of child custody and support will appear in a forthcoming guide. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:12 am by Gregory Forman
The primary issues at trial were the number of overnights Father was spending with the children and whether the court should apply the shared custody child support guidelines (Schedule C), as Father urged, or the sole custody guidelines (Schedule A), as Mother urged. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am by Leslie Sammis
The new subdivision of the rule can be found at Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(b)(1)(A)(i)(8).It appears to apply to both the jailhouse snitch who is in custody or the out of custody confidential informant. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
R.L.M Court Finds Juvenile Delinquent Based on Allegedly Offensive Instant Messages — In re Alex C. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
   He explained that “[c]ourts have often cited the exigency exception ( i.e. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am by Joel R. Brandes
The mother purchased a home within the children's school district to facilitate the custodial arrangement, as a result of which she has a significant commute to work, with its attendant expenses. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
After all, if the jury had acquitted on both counts, the defendant would not be subject to article 6-C at all, despite the sworn statements by the victim concerning multiple incidents of sexual intercourse. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If the People's theory was that the defendant was lawfully in custody, not on the basis of that arrest, but on the basis of an earlier arrest in Queens, it was their burden to come forward with evidence that the Queens arrest was lawful. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
And on that note, that’s today’s ball game. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 pm by Georgialee Lang
Vellacott’s proposed law also allowed that current custody and parenting arrangements could be varied taking into account the new “equal parenting” philosophy by declaring the reformed law a “change in circumstance”, a legal requirement under the present Divorce Act to amend an existing custody order or agreement. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:05 am by K.O. Herston
DCS is not required to use reasonable efforts to reunite a parent with his or her child every time it removes a child from a parent’s custody. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
” Whether Judge Craig’s decision withstands appellate review is anybody’s guess. [read post]