Search for: "Case v. People" Results 2301 - 2320 of 51,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2019, 10:56 am by Steven M. Sweat
People who file lawsuits need to be aware of the discovery rules as shown by Du-All Safety, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by Elizabeth Prochaska
In this case, formerly known as Quila and Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Court of Appeal held that the amendment to the Immigration Rules was disproportionate. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
Now, the Supreme Court has decided to hear a case, McDonald v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am by Steven G. Pearl
Superior Court (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 825, 836 [“while Discover Bank is a case about unconscionability, the rule set forth in Gentry is concerned with the effect of a class action waiver on unwaivable rights regardless of unconscionability”]; People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Hardie v Herald  and Weekly Times ([2016]  VSCA 103), the plaintiff, Ms Raelene Hardie, was a part owner and manager of a strip club in rural Victoria called “Club Rawhide”. [read post]
14 May 2007, 9:26 pm
**Separately,Mondaq covered the Judge Moore opinion in the inequitable conduct case of eSpeed, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:04 am by Florian Mueller
After Nokia brought its infringement cases against OPPO in multiple jurisdictions, OPPO raised various FRAND issues with the No. 1 Intermediate People's Court of Chongqing Municipality of the People's Republic of China, with the ultimate objective of obtaining a global portfolio license on terms to be set by the Chongqing court.At first sight, the outcome is simply consistent with the UK Supreme Court's jurisdictional decisions in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm by INFORRM
Judgment was handed down today in the case of Ferdinand v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 2454 (QB)). [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:11 pm by Jennifer Huddleston
This year, one such low-profile case is Axon Enterprise v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:56 am by Record on Appeal
As a reminder, the criminal case arose from the March 14, 2006 breach of the Ka Loko Reservoir that caused the deaths of seven people. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Sekmadienis v Lithuania ([2018] ECHR 112) the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that a decision to fine a clothing company for the display of adverts referring to “Jesus” and “Mary” was a violation of Article 10. [read post]