Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 48,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2022, 4:38 am
—Will Rogers ____________________________________________1Westmoreland v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:44 am
In a July 2016 decision, Providence Health Care v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 2:07 pm
Mohammadi v Shellpoint Trustees Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 1098 (Ch) was an appeal from the Supreme Court Costs Office. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:59 am
See Dico, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:57 am
Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 6 As if to confirm that housing law is, well, complicated, there is a coda to the Supreme Court decision in Manchester City Council v Pinnock, which has led to a supplementary judgment being handed down. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:18 am
Simcoe v Jacuzzi UK Group plc [2012] EWCA Civ 137; [2012] WLR (D) 35 “The date from which interest ran on an award of costs in the county court in favour of a successful litigant was, by reason of article 2 of the County Court (Interest on Judgment Debts) Order 1991, the date the order for costs was made, not the date on which costs were assessed or agreed. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm
One of the principal purposes of the amendments appears to be the overruling of the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s decision in Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm
Anderson, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:56 pm
”In Lubber, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:22 am
Edith Rapp and Joe Anderson, Jr. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:55 am
Paul v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:14 pm
Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) was the High Court hearing of Birmingham’s appeal from the High Court (Costs) case we reported on in August last year. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:22 pm
Dodd v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:45 pm
The post Botched Employment Contract Cost Employer Over $200,000 appeared first on Michigan Employment Law Advisor. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:23 pm
Do you count those costs as part of the relevant costs? [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:13 pm
These protections meant that Michigan v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 5:34 pm
They sought to recover from the respondents the cost of repairing and/or replacing the front seats in each class vehicle. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 6:42 am
Mass Transit Authority v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:00 am
Dansie Family Trust v. [read post]
