Search for: "Doe 35" Results 2301 - 2320 of 17,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
According to the Examiner, Simpson meant that "when a trademark or trade name is used in a claim as a limitation to identify or describe a particular material or product, the claim does not comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
Pioneer Medical Group,  held that “the Act does not apply unless the defendant health care provider had a substantial caretaking or custodial relationship, involving ongoing responsibility for one or more basic needs, with the elder patient. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 12:30 am by Anna Maria Stein
Background In 2022, a Romanian company applied to register a 39-second EU sound trade mark featuring the famous nursery rhyme “Johnny Johnny Yes Papa” in classes 9, 28, 35, 38 and 41. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:50 pm by Paul Levy
  But I have never seen him rant about rapacious defense lawyers – and I have seen many of them in my 35 years of practice.And unlike Professor Goldman, I do not hold to any general opposition to state-law "regulation of the Internet. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:15 pm by David C. Swedelson
In the 35 years our firm has represented community associations, we have never seen an association that has successfully applied for and received this type of tax-exempt status from the IRS. [read post]
13 May 2016, 11:14 am by Mark Astarita
”By law, the SEC protects the confidentiality of whistleblowers and does not disclose information that might directly or indirectly reveal a whistleblower’s identity.The SEC’s whistleblower program has now awarded more than $62 million to 28 whistleblowers since the program’s inception in 2011. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:28 am by Dennis Crouch
Georgia federal court requesting correction of inventorship under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:15 pm by Dennis Crouch
Whether the Federal Circuit err in allowing Intervention by the USPTO Director under, the patent law provision of 35 U.S.C § 143. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am by Mandelman
  And Robb may think it going out on a limb, but I for one have complete confidence that the State of Arizona will be able to figure out what its own constitution does and does not allow. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:02 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 18-1418 (Whether no-opinion judgments comply with 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Question of the day:  Assuming that Arthrex wins and PTAB judges must be appointed by the President, does this also mean that the Commissioner of Patents must be appointed by the President? [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
However, the Office does not have authority to restructure those fees without first hearing from Congress and the President. [read post]