Search for: "Does 1 - 10"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 43,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2022, 6:07 am
Does this suggest a lowering of the current plausibility bar for inventive step? [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:55 am
One size does not fit all. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 11:56 am
And since it does, what better way to share than via social media? [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 9:04 pm
The consumption of contaminated foods was estimated to cause 550 million illnesses (almost 1 in 10 people) and 230,000 deaths worldwide every year. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
Specifically, the caselaw forecloses the defendant from presenting any evidence or making any argument regarding the following: 1. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:22 pm
LOS ANGELES If approved the Retail Fair Workweek Ordinance will take effect on April 1, 2023. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
What does section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 say and how can the test be met? [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Irrational, arbitrary classification is at the heart of the Equal Protection issuesMerritt: So if Congress lowers the ratio to 12:1, does that make 18:1 irrational? [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to define when a team of lawyers does such a superb job in a difficult case that it should get a sizeable markup beyond the basic amount of fees earned. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:50 pm
By Mark Satta[1] On June 20, in a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the presence of a ninety-year-old World War I memorial in the form of a 32-foot Latin cross on public land in Maryland does not violate the constitutional prohibition against governmental establishment of religion. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 10:11 am
Common divorce myths: 1. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:02 pm
At paragraph 10 of its order the CJEU says that insertion of links by means of framing does not constitute a communication to a new public because the film was already freely available on YouTube. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
What the evidence is alleged to be proving is explained by the [opponent] in the notice of opposition (see also point [1.5] above), in particular with respect to the sole alleged distinguishing feature of the characterising part of claim 1 over D1. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 8:39 am
1. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 2:37 pm
See the March 10, 2016 decision by the Court of Appeal in People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 9:46 am
The law took effect October 10, but penalties for violations will not be imposed before July 1, 2025. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
§522(f)(1)? [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 12:51 pm
1. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
The assertion of the petitioner that in the present case the Board had misunderstood the explanations of the petitioner that were relevant for the decision and, therefore (or for what reasons ever), had not taken them into account as would have been required by the right to be heard (A 113(1)) does not have any support. [9] Therefore, the decision on the present petition does not require the Board to dwell on the question of whether a misunderstanding of the kind alleged… [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 4:04 am
CMS has finalized Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) rates for inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) services for fiscal year (FY) 2018, which begins October 1, 2017. [read post]
