Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 3,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 10:57 am
But the Court rightly nixed that argument, noting that Rule 54(d) does not define “costs,” but says only that when costs exist they should presumptively be awarded to the prevailing party. [read post]
21 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The application documents filed with the EPO contained, apart from the claims and the abstract, description pages 1 to 15 and a set of drawings, comprising Fig. 1 to Fig. 12. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
General Revenue Corp.Docket: 11-1175Issue(s): (1) Whether a prevailing defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) case may be awarded costs for a lawsuit that was not “brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment,” when the FDCPA provides that “[o]n a finding by the court that an action under this section was brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment, the court may award to the defendant attorney’s fees reasonable in relation to… [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:49 am
§72(t)(1), (2)(A)(v). [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:26 pm
Does this require something like a clawback of data shared with third parties? [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:48 pm
The 54-page report identified once again a number of issues that have troubled the stem cell agency for some years. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:42 pm
As FDA acknowledged in the preamble to the Agency’s July 1989 proposed regulations implementing the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Amendments, the law does not “specify procedures to be followed in determining whether a drug that is voluntarily withdrawn from sale by its manufacturer is withdrawn for safety or effectiveness reasons” (54 Fed. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:11 pm
The major difference between the valuations by the experts for each of the parties was twofold: (1) whether cash flow projections for new planned facilities should be included in the valuations; and (2) “the appropriate small company size premium to be applied to the Company’s cost of equity. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:01 pm
It contains an interesting discussion with respect to the use of an A 54(3) document.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:03 am
This regulation does not constitute an infringement of the German public order. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:34 am
This case does not implicate the emergency assistance doctrine. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:24 am
The[y] tell us the case could go at least 1 week. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:04 pm
‘Thus, the law does not demand that the estimation of damages be completely free of all elements of speculation[,]‘ Delahanty, 318 Pa. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Information Administration (EIA) released its analysis of S.2146. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:00 pm
Water tanks supported directly on grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons (18 925 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2:1. 6. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:01 pm
It is therefore necessary, also in this case, to establish whether the indication of this use, which constitutes a method for treatment of the human body by surgery or therapy, may confer novelty to the claimed subject-matter.[4.2] As far as claims covering a method or a use are concerned, the EPC does not contain any explicit provision analogous to those applying to substances or compositions according to A 54(4) and A 54(5). [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:31 pm
Holt Atherton, 835 S.W.2d at 83 n.1; Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am
(the chances of type I and type II errors, respectively) and 1- ? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:37 pm
”1 But data have no effect. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:35 am
Fric to produce an amended list of documents which identifies the photographs and video in her possession and control in which in which she is featured: 1. [read post]
