Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 2301 - 2320 of 6,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2008, 12:00 pm
A juror must: Be a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the county, Be not less than eighteen years of age, Not have been convicted of a felony, and Be able to understand and communicate in the English language. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:36 pm
There simply is no way to reconcile FCC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:45 am by Lawrence Solum
In the years since Marshall’s 1833 ruling in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am by CMS
  On 27 November 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in the landmark case of Halliburton v Chubb [2020] UKSC 48, which has been keenly awaited by the international arbitration community. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 12:32 am by Aneesa Bodiat
The case of O’Connor and others v Oakhurst Dairy This odd judgment begins: ‘For want of a comma, we have this case’. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In fact, the State of Maryland allowed someone to sue on its behalf pursuant to state law in the landmark case of McCullough v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm by NL
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm by NL
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm
An example of such a decision was given in Lord Justice Warrington in Short v Poole Corporation [1926] as ‘a red-haired teacher being dismissed because she had red hair’. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 2:44 am
"Petitioner, in obtaining its two registrations, stated that "aachi" means "distinguished lady" in English. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Also on H-Net is a review of Exit Strategies and State Building edited by Richard Caplan. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 6:29 am by Söğüt Atilla
Guest UPCKat John Snape (Carpmaels) summarised the UPC Court of Appeal’s opt-out decision in AIM v Supponor. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Adam Feldman
United States, Merit Management Group v. [read post]