Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
The employee’s policy stated, in what the Supreme Court described as “admirably simple English”, that the insured was covered “if you have an accident in your vehicle and you kill or injure someone, you damage their property or you damage their vehicle”. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 am
Martin v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 1:11 am
Canada’s Head of State is the same nonagenarian resident of ‘Buck House’ who reigns over us here in Australia. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
More recently, in footnote 20 of its 1997 decision in Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Texas has stated that it considers black and Latino students “under-represented” at the university, based in part on their proportions in the state population. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 8:38 am
The judgment seems to follow the English trait. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
"This is a heartfelt plea to English matrimonial solicitors - please, please, be less polite. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 10:40 am
For thirty years the ex-husband in Janet O. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:50 am
The Dutch Journal on Private International Law (Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht) publishes papers in Dutch and in English. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:30 am
Abdullahi v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 3:15 pm
For example, in English & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
Against the backdrop of this coverage, the English and Welsh press protested vigorously about their being prevented from publishing information. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
That runs us into a second case, Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 4:59 am
But Merpel asks, if you stick a piece of French into a translation program and it comes out in English, who owns the copyright in the English translation ...? [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 In the wake of France’s apparently unencumbered expulsion of individuals on public interest grounds there has been a fresh outcry from the press about the shackles imposed by the Human Rights Convention on the UK authorities which other signatory states seem to ignore with impunity. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:01 am
The right of the state to require vaccination was upheld in Jacobson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
[Day v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
Therefore neither Essers nor Kazemeir were bound by an English jurisdiction clause in the original contracts between Exel and the respondents. [read post]
