Search for: "Google, Inc" Results 2301 - 2320 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2016, 11:17 am by Gustavo Arballo
., como lo son las del Senado cuando trata el acuerdo para designar a un magistrado (conf. art. 99, inc. 4° de la Constitución), las del plenario del Consejo de la Magistratura o las de las comisiones parlamentarias, sino en la cual el público es parte interesada y activa, con derechos de naturaleza procedimental a respetar dentro de la concepción del debido proceso constitucional; con derecho de ofrecer, producir prueba y controlar la que se produce, alegar, etc.Y… [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Google, Inc., and the Ninth Circuit’s suggestion in that case that Garcia might have a right of publicity claim against the filmmakers, even though her copyright claim failed. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 9:33 am by Mark Casper
The KFTC's statement comes as a surprise as a local news outlet reported that the KFTC had cleared Alphabet Inc., Google's parent company, of all antitrust claims against the technology giant. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm by Ron Coleman
That explains why they are only using this blog as a stepping stone to have Google remove any blog with the name “jewsforjesus” in it. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:36 am by Toby Levy
” And in fact, both Ari Rubinstein, a security engineer at Slack Technologies Inc. and Dan Guido, of the independent information security company Trail of Bits, determined that Niantic doesn’t actually collect any data beyond a Google username and email address. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
From the beginning of the case:On December 2, 2013, Apple Inc., Google, Inc. andMotorola Mobility LLC (collectively “Appellees”)) filed apetition for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
For over a decade, I’ve blogged about 1-800 Contacts’ campaign to suppress competitive keyword advertising, including its legislative games (e.g., those times when 1-800 Contacts asked the Utah legislature to ban competitive keyword advertising) and at least 15 lawsuits against competitors costing millions of dollars of legal fees. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
 Too bad Google wasn’t buying, that sale would have sailed right through the Justice Department [sic]. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:08 am by Docket Navigator
" VideoShare, LLC v Google Inc. et al, 1-13-cv-00990 (DED August 2, 2016, Order) (Sleet, J.) [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:27 am by Jani Ihalainen
Under Article L336-2 of the Code of Intellectual Property, a court can, upon application, force an intermediary to take all appropriate measures to prevent or stop such infringement, including, potentially, allowing and/or facilitating (through search results) access to torrent files.Dealing with the case against Google, the Parisian Court found that, although Google France had no direct control over search results (ultimately controlled by its American patent company,… [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Google, Inc., 708 F.3d 1310, 1326 (Fed.Cir. 2013) (“Nearly every patent case will involve someamount of ‘word games,’ because claims and claim constructionsare, after all, just words. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:36 am by Jeffrey M. Schlossberg
Niantic Inc., case number 50-2016-CA-008330, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit for Palm Beach County, Florida. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 The top ten posts of the past 12 months (from a wide range of authors)were as follows: Case Law: PJS v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal grants privacy injunction – Sara Mansoori and Aidan Wills How to avoid defamation – Steven Price News: Daily Mail loses Human Rights Act challenge to CFA success fees and insurance premiums Case Law: Lachaux v Independent Print, “Serious Harm” under the Defamation Act 2013 and the drawing of inferences – Hugh Tomlinson QC… [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 10:32 am by Andrew Serwin and Kai Bartolomeo
The app is offered by Gannett via the Google Play Store and allows the user to access various USA Today media and content, including videos, on the user’s mobile device. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 6:16 am by Pierre Bergeron
In O’Kroley v Fast Case, Inc., the Sixth Circuit rejected a claim brought by Colin O’Kroley who googled himself and did not like the results because, on the summary page, some litigation that he brought was adjoined to a case about indecency with a minor. [read post]