Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 2301 - 2320
of 18,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2012, 3:03 pm
With this information, and re-counting votes, we can reasonably infer that if Kagan had been on the Court since 2000 instead of Scalia, the moderate liberals would have won eight of the nine cases they lost and seventeen of the eighteen cases. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
Once you're following the conversation, the question in Greene v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:42 pm
Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 589 (1948) (authority of state officers to make arrests for federal crimes is, absent federal statutory instruction, a matter of state law); Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:22 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lord Justice Mummery, Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Jacob) has given its ruling today in Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV, Information Management Consultancy Limited (t/a Responsive Designs and/or Tapis UK) and B&Q plc [2007] EWCA Civ 364. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 8:02 am
But, despite all of the social good we do (as Justice Scalia confirmed), we’re continually under attack. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 5:12 am
Which they won’t do because they’re gods. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:00 am
Indeed, it is fair to say that every sitting justice has recently voted for at least one "anti-precedential injunction," that is, an injunction that was not only contestable, but actually at odds with the most relevant available precedents: in the covid cases, these precedents included Employment Division v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
In Musacchio v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
But such a holding seems to be so potentially wrong that I'm not at all sure that's what Justice McKinster actually means.Part of the opinion seems obviously right. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:42 pm
(I'd want to see how Justice Robie responded to my thoughts; it's eminently possible that he's persuade me in the end.) [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:50 pm
Once I finally understood the scoop, my initial impression about the merits somewhat changed.On first read, Justice Fybel seems exactly right as to the doctrine. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am
” As Ronald Mann recounts for this blog, the justices yesterday called for additional briefing in Carpenter v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:02 pm
Right, we're not going to grant injunctive relief. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am
” Justice Kagan also inquired pointedly about the Court’s discussion in Quality King v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:46 pm
Almost ten years after the Justice Reinvestment Act established a new statutory definition of absconding from probation, we’re starting to get a better sense of what behavior does and does not rise to the level of absconding. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:10 am
Yet the statement in Geneva took on a life of its own, as in Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court justice. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:42 am
In the oral argument from SFFS v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:57 pm
by Dennis Crouch In Bilski v. [read post]
