Search for: "In re Human Rights Commission" Results 2301 - 2320 of 3,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
We still have the death penalty, although we are in the minority, and we share the distinction of “most executions” with human rights outlaws: China, Iran, North Korea and Yemen. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:24 am by Robin E. Shea
While you're holed up indoors, be sure to visit Ari Rosenstein's CPEhr's Small Biz HR Blog, which has a free downloadable "2012 Human Resources Updates: What Employers Need to Know. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:25 am by SO Issues
According to a 2007 Human Rights Watch report, federal laws and laws in all 50 states require some sex offenders to register with local law enforcement - some for life, others for a set period of time. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:56 am by Ronaldo Lemos
Unswervingly, she declared at a recent human rights conference that she “prefers the noise of the press to the silence of the dictatorship”. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:42 am by Aoife O'Donoghue
Given, what many argued was an ill-considered choice of Chair for the OSCE, it is incumbent on the states which followed, Lithuania and now Ireland, to re-establish the OSCE’s reputation, most particularly in the field of human rights. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 2:46 am by Editor Charlie
  (Sort of like “bad old YouTube” that got $1.8 billion or so for the infringers and paid zero to the creators out of that sales price–being sued in a class action led by the Premier League and also by Viacom–and “groovy new YouTube” which has something of a détente with rich rights holders but which more or less ignores indies.) [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:28 am by Tom Parker
Victims of human rights violations can be left without remedy. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 Two great Jims among your number—former Chief Judge of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and retired brigadier Jim Cullen and Akin-Gump Super Lawyer and former terrorism case prosecutor Jim Benjamin—provided me a list of topics that might be of interest to this audience, which I understand includes members of the Committees on Military Affairs and Justice, International Human Rights, and Criminal Law, as well as the Task Force on National Security… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
This is a curiously arbitrary list which now needs re-visiting in light of the judgment in R v Peacock. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 8:29 am by The Book Review Editor
 It is hard to say; nonetheless one must note that Justice and the Enemy repeatedly chides some in the human rights world and on the political left for leaving out what Shawcross sees as inconvenient but nevertheless important information. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
You know why; because human capital wears out and you’re getting older and frankly wearing out. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 11:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  On December 6 th , Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivered an historic speech at the United Nations Human Rights Commission calling for international LGBT rights - the first time in history that LGBT rights have been exclusively linked to human rights. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:55 am by David Harlow
Positive test results posted by a patient on Facebook might invite response on a human level, but the response must be more measured. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Max Mosley went to the European Court of Human Rights with his application against the United Kingdom. [read post]