Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 2301 - 2320 of 6,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Optical Express v Associated Newspapers Ltd, 16 November 2016 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
Briefly: At Human Rights At Home Blog, Martha Davis reviews last week’s argument in Lynch v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
It does not however accept the decision as a whole and, as David Davis commented in a statement in the House of Commons, is therefore appealing to the Supreme Court.7)Statement made by David Davis at 15:30 on 7 November 2016 to Parliament. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Another look at the argument comes from Martha Davis at the Human Rights at Home Blog, who observes that right “out of the box, the majority of the justices seemed ready to find that the discriminatory law violated the equal protection clause. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Challenge to Will based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence rejectedIN RE ESTATE OF TORNABENDOCKET NO. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Ibrahim, William & Mary Law School, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation,Small firms, Tech companies ISS Proposes New 2017 Voting Policies Posted by Lyuba Goltser, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Dual-class stock, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, IPOs,ISS, Proxy advisors,… [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 1:30 pm by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
*New Case Law The Davis-Stirling Act promotes the nonjudicial resolution of disputes between homeowners associations (“HOAs”) and their members in various respects. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:45 am by John Jascob
Ventry Jr., a law professor at the University of California, Davis, challenges this conclusion.) [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:36 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Burning the candle at more than one end and not recreational v. work either, just work of various kinds. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:44 am by Kenneth B. Weckstein
The case is Associated Builders and Contractors of Southeast Texas v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 Following a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge sustained the Department's determination and the Authority filed an administrative appeal. [read post]