Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 2301 - 2320 of 178,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 4:38 am
"... by major conference football and men’s basketball, whose athletes represent one class of plaintiffs. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The basis for the plaintiffs allegations was the defendant’s conduct in the 2011 action, consisting of, inter alia, an alleged deceitful representation by the defendant in response to the plaintiffs discovery demands, wherein the defendant represented that there were no notes taken by Town employees related to the plaintiffs alleged violations of the Town Code, and the defendant’s alleged… [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Election lawyers are filing too many frivolous cases “just because the plaintiffs are mad at their political opponents,” Fontes said, adding that they are endangering public faith in democracy. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:03 pm by Chris Rufo | New England Law, US
” Justice Alito in Alexander held that the plaintiff did not meet this standard. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:13 pm by Eric Goldman
Plaintiffs allege that a result of this video and the ensuing negative attention he received, Daniel Rodni went into hiding and made substantial investments in home security, surveillance, and cameras. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
More broadly, Thursday’s decision creates a high bar for plaintiffs in future racial gerrymandering cases to meet. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:40 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
It’s important to note that the assertion of individual defenses does not necessarily defeat a plaintiffs ability to represent a class adequately (P.J. [read post]
23 May 2024, 8:44 am by Marie Nganele
Becker’s client, plaintiff Stefan Soloviev, and his son, Hayden Soloviev, sued defendant Ross School to recover damages related to breach of contract, unjust enrichment, negligent hiring, retention, supervision, and direction, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. [read post]
23 May 2024, 8:44 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Connecticut Appellate Court has remanded the sanctions imposed on Alex Jones's attorney and ordered a new hearing before a different judge The plaintiff in error, Norman A. [read post]
23 May 2024, 8:41 am
Today's advance release attorney discipline law opinion: Lafferty v. [read post]
Elaborating on the point, the Tribunal said punitive clauses aim to penalize rather than compensate, putting the plaintiff in a better position than if the contract were performed. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:14 am by Allan Blutstein
.) -- denying plaintiffs’ motion to compel a search of the CIA's operational files for records concerning Americans allegedly held as prisoners of war following the Korean War; finding that the requested records—if they exist—were protected by Exemption 3 in conjunction with the CIA Information Act, 50 U.S.C. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:39 am by Amir C. Tayrani
District Court for the Northern District of Texas has indicated that she expects to rule on the plaintiffs’ motions for a stay of the effective date and for a preliminary injunction by July 3. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:29 am by Jon Hyman
., the plaintiff — a Black woman fired after an altercation at work — complained on appeal about an alleged inconsistency in the jury's verdict. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:28 am by Eugene Volokh
In response, Plaintiffs argue that Upchurch's GoFundMe comments refer to the Plaintiffs by implication. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
Overall, though, the panelists seemed more interested in the public’s reaction to the Court’s apparent politically motivated decisions rather than to changes in the Court’s composition. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Khail Parris is a partner at Lancaster-based Parris Law Firm, and was lead attorney along with Alexander Wheeler for the plaintiff. [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
The plaintiffs argue that “the Department’s 2024 Overtime Rule largely repeats the errors of the 2016 Rule and fails to address the flaws previously identified by this Court. [read post]