Search for: "State v. Mai"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 133,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2010, 7:25 pm
In D.R.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:41 am
Florida, and Alden v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:02 pm
Ho here (dissenting), and State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
Supreme Court may allow businesses to be sued in states where they have little connection. [read post]
24 May 2007, 3:10 pm
Instead, like the Post Office sidewalk at issue in the Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:35 am
Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) were wrongly decided and that states may pass laws regulating abortion so long as those laws meet a rational basis test. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:24 pm
Patchak (consolidated with Salazar v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:12 am
(E.g., State v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:32 pm
Aswe stated in Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:51 am
Garland, 593 U.S. 155, 171–72 (2021); United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:24 pm
This overturned the previous rule from Quill Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:45 am
§ 1152-such that the federal government may prosecute Indians for virtually any state-law offense committed in Indian country, including on lands promised by treaty for the “exclusive use” of Indian tribes.Lower court materials here. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
In its recent judgment in Mulla v State of UP, the Supreme Court has continued with the trend of emphasising the extremely limited scope of the rarest of rare doctrine first formulated in Bachan Singh.This blog has noted Justice Sinha's contribution to the death penalty debate, where he repeatedly emphasised the fundamental precondition in Bachan Singh---that rarest of rare case will be one where 'the alternative option [of life imprisonment] is unquestionably… [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:21 pm
You help close some cases.But it's a pretty heavy inroad into a pervasive surveillance state, eh? [read post]
16 May 2017, 11:53 am
Defendant stated that he could not take it anymore, and he decided to kill a woman. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:31 pm
State v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:02 am
May 13, 2009)Affirming that multiple claims, including discrimination, are barred by res judicata> Reed v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:44 am
Termination for cause may result in the loss of fringe benefits in retirementFarrell v City of Rensselaer, NYS Supreme Court, Justice James B. [read post]
22 May 2019, 1:43 pm
State v. [read post]
