Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 2301 - 2320 of 10,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2020, 2:49 am
("HCI") sought a concurrent use registration for the mark HANSCOMB CONSULTING & Design (shown below) for various business services, covering the entire United States except for two geographical areas (Hinsdale, Illinois and Los Angeles, California). [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am by Gabriel Chin
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:56 am
Last but not least, Part V, “Trademarks, Certification Marks and Standards” starts with Chapter 12 “Trademarks, Certification Marks and Technical Standards” authored by Jorge L. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:56 am by Immigration Prof
Mark Joseph Stern for Slate recaps the oral arguments in the Supreme Court yesterday in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The patent marking statute, codified at 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 7:00 am by Matt Ramsey
With this growth there has also been a rise in trademark filings with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in all alcohol related sectors. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am by Nicholas Mosvick
In a bid to strengthen Federalist power, President Adams appointed Secretary of State John Marshall to be Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: GYPC, INC., Debtor Case No. 17‐31030 Adv. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh explains at the ABA Journal that June Medical Services v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Arctic Cat”) appeals from a judgmentof the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida that Arctic Cat is not entitled to recover precomplaint damages from Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:48 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
VA 1-987-746 and the United States Trademark Registrations below (collectively “Harley’s Intellectual Property”). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am by Paula Lombardi
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]