Search for: "Unknown Persons Having Interests"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 3,881
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
And if there is even one person who would have cared and would have refrained from committing the crime if the threatened penalty were clearer, then it is unfair to her, at least, to punish her as though she had knowingly incurred the cost of her actions. [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:44 pm
Additionally, respondent refused to provide information to petitioner regarding other aspects of the children's living situation, including the identities of other persons living in the home. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 8:56 am
Many of the Grant’s trial descriptions have a cinematic quality. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Per the court, “state law can create interests that support standing in federal courts. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:44 pm
The details regarding when and where the summit will occur remain unknown, but one thing we can say with confidence is that the stakes of the summit meeting—if it actually takes place—will be immense. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
In his new opinion, Judge Facciola asks EFF to represent the interests of the unknown subject of the records. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
When I have attributed exact quotations, thoughts or conclusions to the participants, that information comes from the person, a colleague with direct knowledge, or from meeting notes, personal diaries, files and government or personal documents.It all sounds simple enough. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:03 am
These matters are confidential and their substance is unknown to the Court. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 8:30 am
Next is what Marshall says “appears to be a concerted and deliberate effort to maintain possession not only of government property but significant state secrets for reasons unknown. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
After all, what possible reason would a blogger, receiving an unsolicited pitch from an unknown flak seeking to get some free publicity for their paying client on some nonsense issue have in not owing the flak a duty of being nice to them? [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:06 pm
All you had to know is what lots of us did know: that the initially low interest rate would be reset later -- would inevitably go up, because of the historic fluctuation in interest rates. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 4:36 pm
The right to have personal information and data deleted from a website, so long as its removal does not interfere with others’ right to free expression, was most recently confirmed by the CJEU in the Google v CNIL case. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 1:10 pm
We should have a better idea soon whether the court is really interested in the legal education, or whether the justices just needed more time to puzzle over briefs that contain such phrases as “a zeta chain portion comprising the intracellular domain to human CD3 ζ [the Greek letter zeta],” a specified “costimulatory signaling region,” and “a binding element that specifically interacts with a selected target. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Moreover, a lottery would ensure that a range of people from different backgrounds with different interests can attend–not just those who have the means to camp out for days on First Street. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
This hesitancy among community members to report also means the full scope of the crisis is unknown. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
He has, over the years, provided consistently thoughtful and interesting commentary on media matters. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:04 pm
”The banks failed to allege facts suggesting that their claim affected the public interest, under the Washington Consumer Protection Act, the court added. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 5:24 pm
As a result, retirement plans have increased in value proportionately. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am
In an interesting examination of the role of social media platforms and terrorism, the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
It was also not a seizure, because “[a]lthough the can may have contained an unknown and unwanted foreign object, it cannot be said that anyone’s possessory interest was interfered with in a meaningful way. [read post]
