Search for: "WEST v. WEST"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 13,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2019, 8:51 am
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court turned worker classification on its head when it decided Dynamex Operations West Inc v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:04 am
In Shell Egypt West Manzala GmbH & Others v Dana Gas Egypt Limited (formerly Centurion Petroleum Corporation) [2009] EWHC 2097 (Comm) Dana Gas Egypt Limited (Dana) submitted that the court had no jurisdiction to hear Shell's application for permission to appeal, allowed under section 69(1) of the Arbitration Act (the Act), or any substantive appeal because of the phrase "final, conclusive and binding" in the relevant arbitration clause.The dispute arose in… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:38 pm
On May 29, 2019, the California State Assembly overwhelmingly passed AB 5, a bill seeking to codify Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:11 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 6:42 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:09 am
The court cited 2 authorities to determine whether the nature of Aetna's claim was equitable: Great West v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 1:46 pm
Hoxha v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:33 am
” Franklin Prescriptions, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:31 am
R (Lawson) v Stafford Magistrates’ Court R (Hadfield) v Manchester Crown Court Bird v Sylvester & Anr Osseily v Westminster CC Stenson & Others v West Dunbartonshire Council R (Walton) v Commission for Social Care Inspection Daily Telegraph, 11th October 2007 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk Please note the Daily Telegraph Law Reports are only available online for one week. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:52 am
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
Kaur v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Courts must defer to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations in its area of expertiseAbramoski v New York State Educ. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:34 am
USA v Morrison by James Walker on Scribd [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:15 pm
HTI IP v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 1:51 am
Last week’s decision of Sharp J in MJN v News Group Newspapers Limited [2011] EWHC 1192 shares some similarities with cases that have caused so much uproar recently, in that it concerns an injunction prohibiting identification of a married premiership footballer who has been having an affair. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:34 pm
West v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 10:43 am
” Babbitt v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:36 pm
See Internet Specialties West, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:58 am
The New York Times labelled West's creations “the most successful thing Kanye West has ever done in fashion” [not in absolute terms, as Mr West’s celebrity stunt in the music video “Famous” was way more impressive].Nonetheless, Kanye West’s actions may not only prompt admiration from the crowds and/or envy from competitors, but also raise concerns of certain authorities, including the Federal… [read post]
